green_card
07-17 12:36 PM
what an ignorant ass. doesnt he realize that IV core is made up of us. We are IV... there is no they. they are not some shady lobbying group.... they are professionals stuck in this mess just like the rest of us....but the only difference is that they are actually doing something to benefit us all using the force of larger numbers...including the jackass that started this poll.
wallpaper dbme2007. tattoo hair lady
Blog Feeds
09-10 12:50 PM
There has been an interesting alliance of antis in both the health care and immigration arenas to scare people in to believing that illegally present immigrants will be eligible for subsidies to secure health insurance under the health care reform proposal being pushed by President Obama. That claim is patently false. But that did not stop one extremist in the Congress, Representative Joe Wilson (R-SC) from screaming "You lie!" when President Obama addressed that myth. This appalling lack of respect has already led the GOP to go in to damage control mode and Wilson issued an apology within minutes of...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/09/president-heckled-by-gop-congressman-over-bogus-claim-that-illegally-present-immigrants-will-be-cove.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/09/president-heckled-by-gop-congressman-over-bogus-claim-that-illegally-present-immigrants-will-be-cove.html)
sidbee
05-30 02:13 PM
Hi People.
Did anyone of you got a PIO Card, through CGNY, using the mail service. If yes , can you please let me know , what all documents , you send(what notarized and what not)??How long it took.
Did anyone of you got a PIO Card, through CGNY, using the mail service. If yes , can you please let me know , what all documents , you send(what notarized and what not)??How long it took.
2011 Bestron DBM2007, preturi
vincepr
08-22 09:24 AM
Any idea who represented skilled workers in the meeting that happened. I don't see Immigration Voice in the list.
Is IV core looking into how they can how they can be part of such meetings in future. If we are not represented, there wont be anything for us even in the comprehensive immigration reform. We employees cant rely on employers to represent us. That why we are where we are today.
Is IV core looking into how they can how they can be part of such meetings in future. If we are not represented, there wont be anything for us even in the comprehensive immigration reform. We employees cant rely on employers to represent us. That why we are where we are today.
more...
MailForHoneyOnly
10-01 01:56 PM
Hi,
I'm on H1 on 8th Year Extension,Got a nice offer from a company, which is not large company, but projects they have are very long term projects I applied for 485 long timeback, but did not applied for my spouse , who is on H4 , applied for H1 which will be validated from 1st Oct'06.Can I switch the company now and start using EAD and apply for my spouse when my PD becomes current , or wait with the current employer till I apply for 485.
Need SUggestion.
or
Can I ask new company to start new GC Process under Perm and apply for I-140 and once its get approved, Use My EB3 PD with the EB2 Perm Application.
Or
Can I use H1 Transfer and AC-21 option since my 8th year extension is till end of 2009.
Any Suggestions will be Very Helpful
I'm on H1 on 8th Year Extension,Got a nice offer from a company, which is not large company, but projects they have are very long term projects I applied for 485 long timeback, but did not applied for my spouse , who is on H4 , applied for H1 which will be validated from 1st Oct'06.Can I switch the company now and start using EAD and apply for my spouse when my PD becomes current , or wait with the current employer till I apply for 485.
Need SUggestion.
or
Can I ask new company to start new GC Process under Perm and apply for I-140 and once its get approved, Use My EB3 PD with the EB2 Perm Application.
Or
Can I use H1 Transfer and AC-21 option since my 8th year extension is till end of 2009.
Any Suggestions will be Very Helpful
gandalf_gray
02-17 01:35 PM
Hi,
My L1B visa & petition with Company A runs upto Sep this year.
I'm applying for H1B petition with company B this year.
my current Company A will try to go for L1B petition extension, so that I can continue being here beyond september.
My concern is if these 2 will clash with each other ?
One of my friends said that whichever petition gets approved latest - will be the one that holds good.
So if L1B extension gets approved after h1B, will that negate H1B ?
and vice-versa ..
Thanks in advance.
My L1B visa & petition with Company A runs upto Sep this year.
I'm applying for H1B petition with company B this year.
my current Company A will try to go for L1B petition extension, so that I can continue being here beyond september.
My concern is if these 2 will clash with each other ?
One of my friends said that whichever petition gets approved latest - will be the one that holds good.
So if L1B extension gets approved after h1B, will that negate H1B ?
and vice-versa ..
Thanks in advance.
more...
![dbme2007. house [aligncenter] [/align] dbme2007. hair The Casey Anthony Fact Index](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_sxLSJQzJ2w3PN1wjnvHPc0vdPv_oVmD3COUZW_ze0-lRIh9Q7Wk-MlrROH9mCd79K8tXYpGogYWKuDX3sN4t1wlemtOttTmk0-wRDd0LfzHb1tlOHWAV4NP-bW_44KaUMPPWsEmH_4JBs8ao0olB5IadQMRlw_gzsBzbnBOtcdk1gqm5rf5VqIgm4K=s0-d "house [aligncenter] [/align] dbme2007. hair The Casey Anthony Fact Index")
skone
02-04 02:58 PM
Hello,
I run an IT business from here in Canada and make about US$ 80K/Year. I am now thinking to move to USA and was wondering how I could use my company to benefit and help me with that.
Is it better to move the company to US or is it better to open a subsidiary in USA? Also what are the minimum requirements to be successful in the immigration visa? Do I need to declare a minimum amount to the Canadian government etc.., that will be a proof for my company etc..?
I run the company myself with my common-law-partner. We do everything, including sending bills, invoices etc..
Thank you for any advice.
I run an IT business from here in Canada and make about US$ 80K/Year. I am now thinking to move to USA and was wondering how I could use my company to benefit and help me with that.
Is it better to move the company to US or is it better to open a subsidiary in USA? Also what are the minimum requirements to be successful in the immigration visa? Do I need to declare a minimum amount to the Canadian government etc.., that will be a proof for my company etc..?
I run the company myself with my common-law-partner. We do everything, including sending bills, invoices etc..
Thank you for any advice.
2010 dbme2007. 2010 Game Information dbme2007. wallpaper from Casey Anthony?
arthsidhu
09-11 08:37 PM
Many of us repeatedly repeated the same repeating mesage to attend DC rally so that it can repeat in the EARS of all repeatedly whining GC seekers visiting repeatedly every immigration website repeatedly thinking that their GC will come some day. I have repeated the word repeat enough times but still want to repeat my message to you all, who want GC. Come to DC and contribute to IV. I repeat COME TO DC AND GET YOUR GC.
more...
Blog Feeds
10-15 06:30 PM
On 10/01/09, President Obama signed a continuing resolution to fund continued federal government operations through October 31, 2009. Included in the legislation were provisions to extend the E-Verify, Religious Worker, Conrad 30 and EB-5 programs.
The continuing resolution was attached to the FY10 Legislative Branch Appropriations bill (H.R. 2918), and was passed by the House of Representatives on 9/25/09 and the Senate on 9/30/09.
The E-Verify, Religious Worker, Conrad 30 and EB-5 programs have all been extended for an additional 30 days, though all they may be extended further in the coming weeks once the Senate and House conference the FY10 Homeland Security Appropriations bill (H.R. 2892).
More... (http://ashwinsharma.com/2009/10/07/latest-immigration-actions-by-pres-obama.aspx?ref=rss)
The continuing resolution was attached to the FY10 Legislative Branch Appropriations bill (H.R. 2918), and was passed by the House of Representatives on 9/25/09 and the Senate on 9/30/09.
The E-Verify, Religious Worker, Conrad 30 and EB-5 programs have all been extended for an additional 30 days, though all they may be extended further in the coming weeks once the Senate and House conference the FY10 Homeland Security Appropriations bill (H.R. 2892).
More... (http://ashwinsharma.com/2009/10/07/latest-immigration-actions-by-pres-obama.aspx?ref=rss)
hair dbme2007. dbme2007. Sep 16, 2010 · Ryan Reynolds; ryan reynolds movies.
sunnymit
03-08 03:53 PM
My lawyer once told me that if you travel outside of the country while your AP application is pending, it means that you have abandoned your application. Not sure if AP renewals/extensions as well but if I have to take a guess, I think it does...
more...
chantu
11-14 04:42 PM
No other fees. If you go to VFS site, everything is written there clearly.
hot hot dbme2007. tattoo Official
anil_gc
09-11 10:07 AM
gurus,
I have a question on visitor visa, please tell me is this legally okay or not
My parents got vistor visa (B1/B2) and planning to visit me,
my sister also got a visitor visa (B1/B2) through a company some time back. But she never visited US and later moved to another company.
All are 10 years multiple entry visas.
Is it okay that sister comes along with my parents? Is there a difference between company applied visitor visa and visitor visa that I sponsered.
Thanking you in advance
Anil
I have a question on visitor visa, please tell me is this legally okay or not
My parents got vistor visa (B1/B2) and planning to visit me,
my sister also got a visitor visa (B1/B2) through a company some time back. But she never visited US and later moved to another company.
All are 10 years multiple entry visas.
Is it okay that sister comes along with my parents? Is there a difference between company applied visitor visa and visitor visa that I sponsered.
Thanking you in advance
Anil
more...
house dbme2007. tattoo Official Single Cover: Hair lady gaga hair single cover hd.
PIXELTRON
03-28 02:24 PM
The promised version.
tattoo “Comedy is dbme2007. more
suttu
03-09 11:21 PM
I was recently added to xerox. send PM if you need anything specific.
more...
pictures house [aligncenter] [/align] dbme2007. hair The Casey Anthony Fact Index
vishi1480
12-18 02:33 PM
My husband's labor was filed in the end of June, no response yet. It was much faster for me in 2006. I would also like to know if anyone got a response.
Thanks!
Thanks!
dresses /DBME2007.part1.rar.html
sam_hoosier
12-28 03:49 PM
I work full time and will continue to work with same employer in the near future, despite having switched to EAD. However, I will use AC21 if a substantially better opportunity presented itself.:)
more...
makeup girlfriend
puskeygadha
12-08 05:36 AM
Lawyer did not give me case number saying that..since it is property of
company I cannot have it...is there a way to steal it
company I cannot have it...is there a way to steal it
girlfriend Games → Angelo v1.0-TE
surabhi
07-23 09:59 AM
Hi,
Apologize for starting new thread, but this is an urgent request and need attention.
I need to respond to a RFE related to proving Programmer Analyst being a Speciaity occupation.
I researched and found a memo from Terrance Way, Director INS issued a memo on this on December 22, 2000 and is available on AILA Infonet
AILA InfoNet at Doc. No. 01040603
I couldnt locate this memo in USCIS policy guidance memoranda search.
Can some one with access to AILA Infonet, please send me this document
Thanks in advance
Regards
Apologize for starting new thread, but this is an urgent request and need attention.
I need to respond to a RFE related to proving Programmer Analyst being a Speciaity occupation.
I researched and found a memo from Terrance Way, Director INS issued a memo on this on December 22, 2000 and is available on AILA Infonet
AILA InfoNet at Doc. No. 01040603
I couldnt locate this memo in USCIS policy guidance memoranda search.
Can some one with access to AILA Infonet, please send me this document
Thanks in advance
Regards
hairstyles Nazwa pliku: DBME2007.exe
![dbme2007. [aligncenter] [/align]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_uNmUjz4R9ZEqQFs0Epr39RrhHrGJSyEyvbPlasj7YSPMBXg8F0QLsoYSf_OTKcpQPtKValyh1UGtQo1s3anCzlJw465RNJyuLyWUokd7r9UWQn3iI8vl7pEDuXaYwzR18b6TimnyKHYB3uMDU=s0-d "[aligncenter] [/align]")
orphean
05-05 09:36 PM
Hi,
I recently (a couple of months ago) switched firms. I have a valid H-1B visa stamp from my prev employer (expiring in Aug 2009). My H-1B transfer was approved and I have a valid I-797.
Can I travel to London, for a week's vacation and re-enter with my prev employer's h-1b visa stamp and the new I-797? I've read that this is possible and that folks have done it.
I was wondering if there was any change to the rule or anything I should be aware about.
cheers
I recently (a couple of months ago) switched firms. I have a valid H-1B visa stamp from my prev employer (expiring in Aug 2009). My H-1B transfer was approved and I have a valid I-797.
Can I travel to London, for a week's vacation and re-enter with my prev employer's h-1b visa stamp and the new I-797? I've read that this is possible and that folks have done it.
I was wondering if there was any change to the rule or anything I should be aware about.
cheers
munnu77
07-07 06:23 PM
sorry..my thread title has not enuf info. I cannot change it,,if someone can change to H4-H1-H4..I wud appreciate
Macaca
04-27 09:43 AM
Sen. Luddite Strikes Again (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/26/AR2007042602257.html) -- Once more, a mystery Republican blocks electronic filing for Senate candidates, Friday, April 27, 2007
JUST AS she did on April 17, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) went to the Senate floor to call for unanimous consent on a common-sense bill that would require candidates to file their campaign finance reports electronically. And just as he or she did on April 17, Sen. Ima Luddite (R-Who Knows Where) voiced opposition. This time the mouthpiece was Sen. Jim Bunning (R-Ky.). "On behalf of the Republican side," he said, "I object." We object to the obstruction.
Honestly, what is the big deal here? Filing campaign finance reports electronically has been standard operating procedure for candidates for the House of Representatives and the White House for years -- as it has been for political parties, political action committees and "527" groups. Yet Senate candidates are still trudging down to the Senate Office of Public Records with paper copies of their reports, which are then passed along to the Federal Election Commission, which sends them to a vendor that punches in the information and zaps it back to the FEC electronically. That finally makes them widely available, sometimes too late for voters to see who's donating to whom and how the money is being spent. With this seeming fear of modernity, it's a wonder the Senate isn't calculating budgets with an abacus. Or is it a fear of disclosure?
After the bill was blocked, Ms. Feinstein, chairman of the Senate Rules and Administration Committee, said, "It is very hard for me to understand who could oppose this and what their reason for opposing it could be." It is very hard for us, too. Sen. Luddite -- whoever he or she may be -- should come out of the shadows and explain the irrational fear that is keeping the Senate from joining the rest of us in the 21st century. Senator anonymous -- Another Day, Another Hold On Finance Bill (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/26/AR2007042602249.html) By Matthew Mosk (http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/email/matthew+mosk/), Washington Post Staff Writer, Friday, April 27, 2007
Sen. Anonymous struck again yesterday.
The infamous unnamed senator (or senators) has for more than a week blocked passage of legislation that would require Senate candidates to file campaign finance reports electronically.
Electronic filings would make the names of campaign donors readily available -- it's how members of the House and presidential candidates have been doing it for years. When Sen. Russell Feingold (D-Wis.) first brought the bill to the floor last week, though, he was told that an unnamed lawmaker objected.
Long-standing Senate custom allows the objection of a single senator to stop a bill in its tracks -- it's known as a secret hold. A measure that passed the Senate earlier this year, and awaits a House vote, would eliminate the practice.
The hold unleashed a torrent of activity on the Internet, as bloggers tried to flush out the identity of the senator responsible for the hold. But after an onslaught of phone calls to Senate offices, the bloggers have no answer. No one owned up to being the culprit.
Yesterday, the bill's sponsor tried again. And again, the Republican floor leader objected. A spokesman for Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said he is sure the name of the secret senator is known "in the cloakroom," but he said that misses the point.
"A hold can't stop something from coming to the floor," Don Stewart said. "It can only stop it from being pushed through without a full and open debate on the bill."
That's true -- sponsors had been trying to pass the bill by unanimous consent, which does not permit amendment or debate. But Feingold told the liberal blog Daily Kos that the path was typical for a bill with 35 bipartisan co-sponsors that did not elicit a single objection in committee.
Writing on the blog yesterday, Feingold said: "The fact is that someone anonymously blocked the bill, . . . that person has made no effort to resolve his or her concerns with us, and the Republican leadership won't even tell us who that person is."
JUST AS she did on April 17, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) went to the Senate floor to call for unanimous consent on a common-sense bill that would require candidates to file their campaign finance reports electronically. And just as he or she did on April 17, Sen. Ima Luddite (R-Who Knows Where) voiced opposition. This time the mouthpiece was Sen. Jim Bunning (R-Ky.). "On behalf of the Republican side," he said, "I object." We object to the obstruction.
Honestly, what is the big deal here? Filing campaign finance reports electronically has been standard operating procedure for candidates for the House of Representatives and the White House for years -- as it has been for political parties, political action committees and "527" groups. Yet Senate candidates are still trudging down to the Senate Office of Public Records with paper copies of their reports, which are then passed along to the Federal Election Commission, which sends them to a vendor that punches in the information and zaps it back to the FEC electronically. That finally makes them widely available, sometimes too late for voters to see who's donating to whom and how the money is being spent. With this seeming fear of modernity, it's a wonder the Senate isn't calculating budgets with an abacus. Or is it a fear of disclosure?
After the bill was blocked, Ms. Feinstein, chairman of the Senate Rules and Administration Committee, said, "It is very hard for me to understand who could oppose this and what their reason for opposing it could be." It is very hard for us, too. Sen. Luddite -- whoever he or she may be -- should come out of the shadows and explain the irrational fear that is keeping the Senate from joining the rest of us in the 21st century. Senator anonymous -- Another Day, Another Hold On Finance Bill (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/26/AR2007042602249.html) By Matthew Mosk (http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/email/matthew+mosk/), Washington Post Staff Writer, Friday, April 27, 2007
Sen. Anonymous struck again yesterday.
The infamous unnamed senator (or senators) has for more than a week blocked passage of legislation that would require Senate candidates to file campaign finance reports electronically.
Electronic filings would make the names of campaign donors readily available -- it's how members of the House and presidential candidates have been doing it for years. When Sen. Russell Feingold (D-Wis.) first brought the bill to the floor last week, though, he was told that an unnamed lawmaker objected.
Long-standing Senate custom allows the objection of a single senator to stop a bill in its tracks -- it's known as a secret hold. A measure that passed the Senate earlier this year, and awaits a House vote, would eliminate the practice.
The hold unleashed a torrent of activity on the Internet, as bloggers tried to flush out the identity of the senator responsible for the hold. But after an onslaught of phone calls to Senate offices, the bloggers have no answer. No one owned up to being the culprit.
Yesterday, the bill's sponsor tried again. And again, the Republican floor leader objected. A spokesman for Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said he is sure the name of the secret senator is known "in the cloakroom," but he said that misses the point.
"A hold can't stop something from coming to the floor," Don Stewart said. "It can only stop it from being pushed through without a full and open debate on the bill."
That's true -- sponsors had been trying to pass the bill by unanimous consent, which does not permit amendment or debate. But Feingold told the liberal blog Daily Kos that the path was typical for a bill with 35 bipartisan co-sponsors that did not elicit a single objection in committee.
Writing on the blog yesterday, Feingold said: "The fact is that someone anonymously blocked the bill, . . . that person has made no effort to resolve his or her concerns with us, and the Republican leadership won't even tell us who that person is."
No comments:
Post a Comment